Jury Pool: Guest Editorial by Harold E. West
Tonight, will be an important night for the city of New Haven. We will be
hearing again from the public about the Jury Pool project. I hope the room is
again filled to capacity.
One of the persons opposed to the project
implied that he is part of the "silent majority" opposed to council's alleged
"tax and spend" policies. I believe the silent majority may be those who want to
see New Haven move forward with the project.
Over the years, each summer,
I have watched numbers of children and young people walking past my home in
their bathing suits with a towel over their shoulder. It has been a part of what
I believe makes my neighborhood what it is - family friendly and a great place
to live.
If the pool is closed, I believe it will have a profound impact
not just on the neighborhood but on the entire community. These days, the cost
to each taxpayer is less than the price of a tank of gas in most cases. With no
end in sight to the gaso line situation, more and more people will be staying
close to home and will want to enjoy the parks and recreational facilities New
Haven offers.
Without Jury pool, what will these young people do? Sit at
home in front of the computer or the TV? Or worse, be out throwing rocks through
windows of abandoned stores and homes? Or, getting into other sorts of mischief?
This decision is one that may determine our future direction as a city.
Are we to be a city defined by borders, stores, and houses? Or, are we to be a
community? A community that works together for the betterment of all.
I
am not a pool person. I am however, willing to pay my share of the taxes to give
the young people in New Haven as well as my children and grandchildren a safe
and convenient place to enjoy their summers.
Some have said that if we
close Jury Pool, we will still have two pools in New Haven. Some of these same
folks are concerned about increased traffic and parking problems in the area.
What will the problems be at the remaining pools when they all go
there?
I have heard from a "silent majority" that wants Jury Pool to stay
and/or improve. I hope that they are all out in force tonight. I have encouraged
them to be there for this meeting and all council meeting to make themselves
heard.
If we are not willing to invest in our community to improve the
quality of life, how can we ask others to do so? If you are asked to show
prospective business owners the highlights of New Haven, what will you show
them? Will they be impressed by how much money we saved by closing pools and
cutting back on recreational activities at our parks?
Or, would you rather
show them our neighborhood pools that are well maintained and full of the noise
of happy, playing children?
I hope we hear from you tonight and at all
future council meetings where these important issues are on the table.
Harold E. West
New Haven City Council
District 2
Mr. West- I would like to thank you and Ms. Hill, and Mr. Werling who are indeed looking out for the future of our community and not just the here and now. It's easy for anyone to be shortsighted and say that we can't afford this right now. As for who is the majority- I think the scientific survey proves it is the people who want a new pool the same size or larger and with more amenities. Because unless anyone can truly say he or she has talked to more than 1300 people and kept records of what they said- the survey is the best thing right now representing the public opinion. It is telling us what is the TRUE majority. After all, that was the whole point! It's unfortunate if we tell the people that took the time to fill this out and send it in that their opinions don't count, and you MUST fit a three hour city council meeting into your schedule every other week if you want to matter as a citizen in New Haven.
Reply to this
I think New Haven pool should be closed and only have 2 pools for the city of New Haven. I don't think it is cost effective to support 3 pools. I am sure NH pool is not ADA complaint either and would take tax $$ to bring it up to code also. Just a thought!!
Reply to this